Saturday, June 17, 2017

Pakistan: man sentenced to death for blasphemy on Facebook

By David Chutlashvili

"Taimoor Raza was found guilty of insulting the prophet Muhammad during an argument on social media with a counter-terrorism official," reports theguardian:

"An anti-terrorism court in Pakistan has sentenced a man to death for allegedly committing blasphemy on Facebook, the latest step in an intensified crackdown on dissent on social media.

A court in Bahawalpur handed out the verdict, the harshest yet for such a crime, after finding Taimoor Raza, 30, guilty of insulting the prophet Muhammad.

Raza was arrested last year after a debate about Islam on Facebook with a man who turned out to be a counter-terrorism agent. He was one among 15 people arrested by the counter-terrorism department last year, accused of blasphemy, according to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan.

The verdict is part of a wider crackdown on perceived dissent on social media in a country where unfounded allegations of blasphemy can lead to mob vigilante justice."

Raza’s brother, Waseem Abbas, said the family was “poor but literate”, and belonged to Pakistan’s minority Shia Muslim community. “My brother indulged in a sectarian debate on Facebook with a person, who we later come to know, was a [counter-terrorism department] official with the name of Muhammad Usman,” he said.

Raza’s defence attorney said his client had been charged with two unrelated sections of the law to ensure the maximum penalty. “Initially, it was a case of insulting remarks on sectarian grounds and the offence was 298A, which punishes for derogatory remarks about other religious personalities for up to two years,” said Fida Hussain Rana, the defence counsel. Raza was later charged unde section 295C of the penal code, related to “derogatory acts against prophet Muhammad”, Rana said.

"Social media represents a new battleground for the Pakistani fight against blasphemy. Authorities have asked Twitter and Facebook to help identify users sharing blasphemous material, and have distributed text messages encouraging Pakistanis to report fellow citizens.


Human rights defenders have expressed concern that the country’s blasphemy laws, and the authorities’ zealous application of them, provide a tool for people to carry out personal vendettas, particularly because nobody is ever punished for making false accusations," says Sune Engel Rasmussen

“The casual manner in which death sentences are handed in blasphemy cases coupled with the lack of orientation of Pakistani courts with technology makes this a very dangerous situation,” said Saroop Ijaz, a lawyer with Human Rights Watch in Pakistan.

“Such sentences will embolden those who want to wrongly frame people,” he said, noting with concern that Saturday’s sentence was handed down by an anti-terrorism court, not a regular court. “The confusion between national security and religion is very alarming,” Ijaz said.

According to theguardian, Aside from blasphemy, national security charges are also levelled against people who say their only offence is opposition to the government.

Recently, the Federal Investigation Agency detained dozens of social media users for posting “anti-military” content, including journalists and supporters of the opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e Insaf (PTI) party, one of whom shared a satirical photo of prime minister Nawaz Sharif.

They were detained under the controversial Prevention of Electronic Crime Act, passed last year, which has been criticised for curbing human rights and giving overreaching powers to law enforcement agencies.

An FIA official told the Guardian that his agency had orders from the interior ministry to interrogate, and seize laptops and phones, without warrant. “We are authorised to detain anyone, just on suspicion,” the agent said.

Quratulain Zaman, human rights defender with Bytes for All Pakistan, said the harassment of social media users was unprecedented, and a sign of social media’s growing ability to shape public opinion, including against the military.

While Raza is the first person sentenced to death for blasphemy on social media, several others are on death row for alleged blasphemy in public. Among them is Asia Bibi, a Christian woman convicted in 2010 after a row with two Muslim women in a village in Punjab. With a long-awaited final appeal adjourned, Bibi is still in solitary confinement.

In Pakistan, blasphemy is so contentious that the mere mention of unfounded allegations can ignite mass uproar. In April, a mob at a north-western university took 23-year-old Mashal Khan from his dormitory and lynched him, angered by accusations that Khan had offended Islam.

Last week, a joint investigation concluded the baseless allegations had been a conspiracy by some students and university staff.

In another incident, in May, a 10-year-old boy was killed when a mob tried to storm a police station in Balochistan in anger at a man held on blasphemy charges.

Four people were sentenced to death for blasphemy last year, according to the HRCP.


In a 2016 report by the commission, Justice Ibadur Rehman Lodhi rejected most blasphemy allegations. “A majority of blasphemy cases were based on false accusations, stemming from property disputes or other personal or family vendettas rather than genuine instances of blasphemy,” he said.

This story is very bitter and frighteningIt is shocking that someone is sentenced to death in the 21st century for blasphemy, for one little comment on Facebook. But that is OUR reality (Yes, OUR reality, because the whole world is globalized today). Nevertheless, the atheists and freethinkers in many Western countries are in the majority, the governments of these countries often do nothing against the death of atheists and other freethinkers in developing countries. Why? I do not know exactly. Perhaps because we atheists and other freethinkers are not very well organized? Or our democracies are not developing enough? Really, the alarm is weak when an atheist dies, yes. Governments in many Western countries are silent when an atheist dies. The first American president was Barack Obama, who protested openly against the death of atheists. Barack Obama signed a law to protect atheists. But that happened recently. And today, in the government is Donald Trump, a Christian, a populist, the little shadow of Obama... 

I think all Western countries and all Western newspapers and media must protest against the death of all atheists better. All atheists in the world must be safe. We must not forget these people. 



"Blasphemy is a sensitive charge in conservative Muslim Pakistan, where even unproven allegations can trigger mob lynchings and violence"  theguardian (Source). Photograph: Faisal Mahmood/REUTERS

Monday, June 5, 2017

11-YEAR-OLD GIRL FORCED TO MARRY HER RAPIST IN FLORIDA

By David Chutlashvili



Featured image from a campaign against children marriage, via Oppositionreports

Recently the New York Times published the shocking story of Sherry Johnson. 

Johnson was raped by a 20-year-old member of her church and became pregnant in Florida and learned very quickly that Christianity can be very evil and cruel to its adherents.

“It was forced on me,” she told the Times

(See, authorities had begun sniffing around because she was pregnant with a 20-year-old’s child, so church official made the decision that the best way to avoid embarrassment was to marry her off to her rapist).

Stupid parents:

"My mom asked me if I wanted to get married, and I said, ‘I don’t know, what is marriage, how do I act like a wife?’” Johnson remembers today, many years later. “She said, ‘Well, I guess you’re just going to get married.’"

So she was. A government clerk in Tampa, Fla., refused to marry an 11-year-old, even though this was legal in the state, so the wedding party went to nearby Pinellas County, where the clerk issued a marriage license. 

"Johnson was raped by both a minister and a parishioner, and the judge approved the marriage to the rapist who caused her to give birth at the age of 10 so that the investigation would end," reports Oppositionreports.com.


“What we want is for you to get married,” the judge told her.

“It was a terrible life,” Johnson says, noting that she missed school and spent her time changing diapers for what would eventually be nine children. Her husband would occasionally disappear and leave her to deal with everything.

“They took the handcuffs from handcuffing him,” she says.

"How can this happen? Because it’s perfectly legal. In most states, it is perfectly legal for a man to marry a child. While some have at least passed laws limiting the age to 16 or 17 and above, most have no limit whatsoever. Child marriage, which the United States condemned in other countries as a “human rights abuse that contributes to economic hardship” in a State Department document last year, is a practice that must end," says John Prager



This story is very shocking and alarming. It is terrible if someone marries an 11-year-old child. At this age the children are immature for a sexual life. And the marriage is particularly alarming because then the children often have no chance to learn. In Germany, a 14-year-old teenager can have sex. This is a normal age, but not for marriage. Marriage is very difficult as a social element. 

Florida is a part of the Western world... And many Florida residents are laughing at the Muslims who marry immature children... Do not they know that this is happening in their own state? 

Sex with immature children must be strictly forbidden! The pedophiles must be severely punished! 

The religions must not rape our children!